Islam.

It is always beneficial to have a politician who knows how to convince human society with logical and truthful arguments, no matter how painful they may be. Politicians who help you engage in intellectual masturbation about a superior race/nation are the same nonsense as imams who promise paradise for themselves and hell for infidels. Garbage conservative politicians like Putin and Trump tell their citizens not to worry about what inferior nations do because they want to have the same kind of control over their own people. If the UN prohibits any form of slavery and humiliation of peoples... garbage politicians like Putin and Trump would no longer have space to enslave and humiliate their own people.

Aakord said:

It is always beneficial to have a politician who knows how to convince human society with logical and truthful arguments, no matter how painful they may be. Politicians who help you engage in intellectual masturbation about a superior race/nation are the same nonsense as imams who promise paradise for themselves and hell for infidels. Garbage conservative politicians like Putin and Trump tell their citizens not to worry about what inferior nations do because they want to have the same kind of control over their own people. If the UN prohibits any form of slavery and humiliation of peoples... garbage politicians like Putin and Trump would no longer have space to enslave and humiliate their own people.

This is just retarded. First of all politicians are and should be a representation of the people, if you want a virtuous and logical/rational leader then you might want a king or monarch ruling you (and even then odds are the king is not going to be wise, even less so his lineage). If the people themselves don’t want anything to do with foreign lands as opposed to dealing with the strifes within their own borders, then what basis does any politician have by suggesting we should civilise/enlighten:/liberate foreigners from THEMSELVES. Again, war torn third world countries are that way because the people there choose to live and deal with it that way, us being there and wasting our lives trying to ‘better’ people does nothing but breed further animosity for the west and strains the loss of life of western men.

A Trumputin troll might make you happy by promoting racial self wanking or angry by calling you a retard. However, as an average reader, you don't need to follow their BS or anyone else's, including mine if you don't like what I write. You have resources to understand beyond the wall of Nazi-crap that Trumputin trolls create.

Let's see how the International Court of Justice addresses current world's crisis:

Hamas is being investigated for war crimes.
Netanyahu is being investigated for war crimes.
US military (thus US government) is being investigated for war crimes.
Putin is being investigated for war crimes.

Someone in Gaza could ask Hamas, "If you're innocent, why don't you go to the ICJ and clear your name?"
The same question can be asked by an Israeli citizen to Netanyahu, by a Russian to Putin, and by a US citizen to Trump (as well as Obama, Biden, and anyone else before them).

It looks like that all these people KNOW already they are guilty, isn't?

If you were a Trumputin troll, what would you do? You cannot get both Trump, Putin, Hamas and Netanyahu attacked by the same people, right? Because you'll have all this mass of people joint together against a bunch of war criminals.

Now, average reader, you can understand why the trumputin trolls are in this place with their BS. Now, you (still talking to the averange reader, not the trumptin trash) couldsay "but Aakord, how we know you're not a troll yourself?", well, good news! That's exactly what I want to see: people checking if they have a troll in front of them. I don't need you to "trust me" or any sort of BS, I want people use their logic, and logic is NOT about following random BS on a porn website!

You're supposed to challenge your own mind, that's what logic is all about. The only thing one can do in your help, is placing clues; and that's what I am doing.

PS edit: I am placing clues, I am not going to babysit or changing your diapers. If the trumputin trolls will be back with more wanking&insult, I certainly will not feed them. So don't expect me to always interact with their BS. They will eventually leave insult to me and/or everyone else in hope to get some more crap-feed.

DO NOT FEED if you don't have something to say to everyone else (never them).

AryanSuperSoldier said:

It wasn’t just the Arabs, it was the moors and Berbers (North Africans who constantly raided and attacked along Western Europe), and Turks who are technically not Arabic, but a mix between asiatic and middle eastern/persian.

And yes the first crusades were all a response to outside aggression. Idk about like the 58th or however many crusades but I know the first 4 or so were like that.

I'll never understand the leftist claim that the crusades were something to be looked down upon, the inital crusade started because the muslim caliphate ( a brutal empire that was massive on slavery, allowed for sex slavery and heavily advocated for breeding native peoples out of their nations [just look at Egypt] ) was forcefully invading nearby nations and heavily punishing christians for being christian (heavy taxes, enslaving them, forced conversion, destroying churches) and when Europe who had endured a 400 year dark age due to the damage these hostile takeovers were doing to their trade had enough after that empire had started to enter europe via Iberia (Spain & Portugal) they decided enough was enough and banded together to erradicate the threat.

The 1st Crusade wasn't some racist tyraid against people who were different, it was humanity's finest hour - when you manage to get England, France & Germany (We hate eachother) to join forces to destroy you, you know you've fucked up

So, if we were in an Islamic extremism forum what would we see? Well, a bunch of wankers jerking off while sharing the glorious history of their faith/race.

Now, similarly in Western forums we find Nazi wankers who, envious of Islamic wanker shit, are looking for spaces to jerk off to the glorious history of their faith/race.

Here is what you need in a nutshell to understand Islamic extremism: wankers exactly like the Nazis (usually trumputin trolls) we sometimes find in Western.

Legitimately something else to add is I really can't get over how retarded and autistic their religion is.

I have a friend who's view of women is literally the most Incel view of them i've ever seen and it stems from being a muslim - he literally told me it's Haram (Sinful) to talk to a woman unless the conversation is transactional ( I.E you get some information you want out of it or something) , really i think this is just him hiding behind Islam's Incel views of women to avoid actually having to get off his ass and improve his social skills, apparently "flirting is haram" too because god forbid you express a romantic interest to a woman you intend to spend the rest of your life with that has any more subtly than a brick.

Islam really is the worst religion and I wish people could see it for what it is, sadly most people will literally just claim " racist! " or " islamaphobe! " to shut down the conversation before it can begin.

IvoryFutaIII said:

Legitimately something else to add is I really can't get over how retarded and autistic their religion is.

I have a friend who's view of women is literally the most Incel view of them i've ever seen and it stems from being a muslim - he literally told me it's Haram (Sinful) to talk to a woman unless the conversation is transactional ( I.E you get some information you want out of it or something) , really i think this is just him hiding behind Islam's Incel views of women to avoid actually having to get off his ass and improve his social skills, apparently "flirting is haram" too because god forbid you express a romantic interest to a woman you intend to spend the rest of your life with that has any more subtly than a brick.

Islam really is the worst religion and I wish people could see it for what it is, sadly most people will literally just claim " racist! " or " islamaphobe! " to shut down the conversation before it can begin.

I think there is perhaps a worse religion but the jannies don't like it when we talk about them. Also I find Orthodogs to be equal to Moslems. But I digress, in the west you cannot criticize anything but what is viewed as the establishment. Of course you can criticize Christianity, which has had its teeth in Europeans for 1800 years or so. In a manner of speaking, you can criticize the boot on the other guy's neck, but not the boot on yours.

This sounds like a schizopost, but I think all Abrahamic religions are death cults centered around destroying mankind. I think neopagans are atheists larping, I think atheists are pagans larping, and I think European spirituality was killed by the sons of Abraham. Islam is just another part of that. The inbred desert semites control with religion what they cannot conquer, and they need their oppressive laws over eachother to maintain order and enough coherency to fend off invasion.

TheBlondAnthropologist said:

I think there is perhaps a worse religion but the jannies don't like it when we talk about them. Also I find Orthodogs to be equal to Moslems. But I digress, in the west you cannot criticize anything but what is viewed as the establishment. Of course you can criticize Christianity, which has had its teeth in Europeans for 1800 years or so. In a manner of speaking, you can criticize the boot on the other guy's neck, but not the boot on yours.

This sounds like a schizopost, but I think all Abrahamic religions are death cults centered around destroying mankind. I think neopagans are atheists larping, I think atheists are pagans larping, and I think European spirituality was killed by the sons of Abraham. Islam is just another part of that. The inbred desert semites control with religion what they cannot conquer, and they need their oppressive laws over eachother to maintain order and enough coherency to fend off invasion.

I am honestly rapidly approaching the same conclusion

Nordic_redhaired_Bvll said:

I am honestly rapidly approaching the same conclusion

There will be new gods in time. European spirituality, the worship of the very world we live in, already exists. As polluted and diluted as it is, the cult of scientific progress is inherently a European thing. If it could be shown for what it really was, and cleansed of impurity, these new gods would make themselves apparent.

TheBlondAnthropologist said:

I think there is perhaps a worse religion but the jannies don't like it when we talk about them. Also I find Orthodogs to be equal to Moslems. But I digress, in the west you cannot criticize anything but what is viewed as the establishment. Of course you can criticize Christianity, which has had its teeth in Europeans for 1800 years or so. In a manner of speaking, you can criticize the boot on the other guy's neck, but not the boot on yours.

This sounds like a schizopost, but I think all Abrahamic religions are death cults centered around destroying mankind. I think neopagans are atheists larping, I think atheists are pagans larping, and I think European spirituality was killed by the sons of Abraham. Islam is just another part of that. The inbred desert semites control with religion what they cannot conquer, and they need their oppressive laws over eachother to maintain order and enough coherency to fend off invasion.

Jews tend to hate christianity so i dont think that follows. Furthermore christianity has helped a lot and is actually a religion of peace.

fkiblaze said:

Jews tend to hate christianity so i dont think that follows. Furthermore christianity has helped a lot and is actually a religion of peace.

Hey man, follow whatever Abrahamic Judean faith you want, I'm not your father.

UkkiLevsWildRide said:

I think there is perhaps a worse religion but the jannies don't like it when we talk about them. Also I find Orthodogs to be equal to Moslems. But I digress, in the west you cannot criticize anything but what is viewed as the establishment. Of course you can criticize Christianity, which has had its teeth in Europeans for 1800 years or so. In a manner of speaking, you can criticize the boot on the other guy's neck, but not the boot on yours.

This sounds like a schizopost, but I think all Abrahamic religions are death cults centered around destroying mankind. I think neopagans are atheists larping, I think atheists are pagans larping, and I think European spirituality was killed by the sons of Abraham. Islam is just another part of that. The inbred desert semites control with religion what they cannot conquer, and they need their oppressive laws over eachother to maintain order and enough coherency to fend off invasion.

You can talk about kikes as much as you want. As long as you don't derail every single thread that never mentions them

fkiblaze said:

Jews tend to hate christianity so i dont think that follows. Furthermore christianity has helped a lot and is actually a religion of peace.

That is if peace is a desirable state of man. Machiavelli has other ideas.

AryanSuperSoldier said:

That is if peace is a desirable state of man. Machiavelli has other ideas.

Machiavelli does not, he merely stated what is, not what should be.

IvoryFutaIII said:

I've made a similar post but muslim ignorance really gets under my skin, I'm from England and have grown up around muslims all my life ( the west midlands might as well be pakistan 2) and it really gets under my skin how ignorant they are and afraid of change they happen to be.
It obviously depends on what generation of immigrant their family is, how rebelious they are ( a few of my muslim friends have girlfriends and are very liberal about certain viewpoints, the ceritifed good boys however will double and tripple down on religion )

Like I talk to my one friend who's just decided " youtube is for religious videos now " and it's made him 100x worse - he holds very sexist views towards women and when challenged on them will just say " Haram! " and show me some scripture then when I break that down and explain to him how it's sexist and or retarded he just keeps arguing with circular logic until i get pissed off enough to just stop talking to him for a bit because it's not worth wasting anymore time on him being a retard.
But this doesn't just stop at women, he can't fathom the holy trinity from christanity, tries to defend the worst parts of Islam ( their holy prophet muhammed marrying a child, the promise of 72 full breasted virgins if they get to heaven, slavery, blasphemy laws, etc ) with some of the weakest arguements and most stupid reaches of all time.
It honestly pisses me off that he refuses to grow or change because he can just hide behind a religion that allows for and even promotes men to act like incel virgins - which is precisely what he could be described as - he's a skinny nerd with glasses that is too scared to raise his voice to a normal level outside who lacks social skills and is too afraid to talk to new people let alone specifically WOMEN , why wouldn't he benefit from a system that treats women like pets?
It honestly pisses me off knowing that it's likely he will actually end up going on to have children of his own just because of arranged marriages while other men are good people that put effort into their personality and apperance are failing to get dates.

Really this forum was just for me to rant about my bitch ass muslim friend acting like a complete incel but anyone else who hates islam or has gripes about it can post there stuff here - I really didn't think about it much growing up until i accidentally stumbled across " the aspothate prophet " on youtube and to my horror found a lot of the things he said about islam as an ex-muslim to be true.

For the most part they aren't all this die hard and the girls are usually a lot more liberal on the rules mainly because their own religion treats them as property, I've flirted with quite a few hijabis and a lot of the more rebelious muslim girls will 100% give you sloppy toppy under the counter even as a white guy ( they're not meant to have romance with non-muslims ) If they won't be seen but the ignorance of some muslim men makes me want to nuke arab countries

Is he a White Muslim or a Pakistani? That's my big question.

fkiblaze said:

Machiavelli does not, he merely stated what is, not what should be.

He stated that man’s ultimate state of being is not peace, that’s what I mean.

lovecrown21 said:

You can talk about kikes as much as you want. As long as you don't derail every single thread that never mentions them

Okay so basically the Jews are responsible for the spread of these semitic abrahamic desert religions which are meant to bring about their mythical end-times. And the atheistic neopaganism is just another prong of that, perverting both the true European spirituality and ingenuity.

AryanSuperSoldier said:

That is if peace is a desirable state of man. Machiavelli has other ideas.

"Happy is the city, for in times of peace prepares for war."
~ Venetian Arsenal